Skip to content
Menu
SAG Watchdog
  • Home
  • Classics
  • Links
  • Contact
  • About
  • Archives
    • Archives

      • February 2021
      • January 2021
      • December 2020
      • November 2020
      • October 2020
      • September 2020
      • August 2020
      • July 2020
      • June 2020
      • May 2020
      • April 2020
      • March 2020
      • February 2020
      • January 2020
      • December 2019
      • November 2019
      • October 2019
      • September 2019
      • August 2019
      • July 2019
      • June 2019
      • May 2019
      • April 2019
      • March 2019
      • February 2019
      • January 2019
      • December 2018
      • November 2018
      • October 2018
      • September 2018
      • August 2018
      • July 2018
      • June 2018
      • May 2018
      • April 2018
      • March 2018
      • February 2018
      • January 2018
      • December 2017
      • November 2017
      • October 2017
      • September 2017
      • August 2017
      • July 2017
      • June 2017
      • May 2017
      • April 2017
      • March 2017
      • February 2017
      • January 2017
      • December 2016
      • November 2016
      • October 2016
      • September 2016
      • August 2016
      • July 2016
      • June 2016
      • May 2016
      • April 2016
      • March 2016
      • February 2016
      • January 2016
      • December 2015
      • November 2015
      • October 2015
      • September 2015
      • August 2015
      • July 2015
      • June 2015
      • May 2015
      • April 2015
      • March 2015
      • February 2015
      • January 2015
      • December 2014
      • November 2014
      • October 2014
      • September 2014
      • August 2014
      • July 2014
      • June 2014
      • May 2014
      • April 2014
      • March 2014
      • February 2014
      • January 2014
      • December 2013
      • November 2013
      • October 2013
      • September 2013
      • August 2013
      • July 2013
      • June 2013
      • May 2013
      • April 2013
      • March 2013
      • February 2013
      • January 2013
      • December 2012
      • November 2012
      • October 2012
      • September 2012
      • August 2012
      • July 2012
      • June 2012
      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • April 2007
      • April 2006
      • April 2005
      • April 2004
      • March 2004
      • October 2003
      • September 2003
      • April 2003
Close Menu
November 3, 2009

Everything you want to know about the Atmospheric Voices clause in the proposed Interactive Contract but were afraid to ask!

Arlin Miller

Everything you want to know about the Atmospheric Voices clause in the proposed Interactive Contract but were afraid to ask!

Atmospheric Voices are defined as voices that are not lead characters, do not have more than 300 scripted words, and do not advance the principal storyline.

Question: Since, I don’t want to alienate my employer, what would be the best way to complain during the session if some of the twenty atmospheric voices that I’m doing have over 300 words and advance the storyline.

Answer: Under your breath.

—

Question: The supporters of the proposed new Interactive contract that allows one actors to do twenty voices for a session fee are telling me it will create more jobs. How should I respond?

Answer: Since under the current contract, the actor can only be required to do three voices for a session fee, and under the proposed contract, the same actor is required to do up twenty voices for a session fee, it’s elementary that fewer actors will be used. And therefore the atmospheric voices deal will not create more work for interactive actors, but on the contrary will create less work. Your response to those who told you that it would should be “Do the Math!” Oh, and just to be on the safe side better supply them with a calculator.
—

Question: The AFTRA San Francisco local president is telling those online that although producers will have the capability to have an actor do 6000 words in a session, it was highly improbable that they would use it. Your response!

Answer: Ain’t that something like what what Truman said to Oppenheimer?

Under the new proposed Interactive category called Atmospheric voices performers will be required to do up to twenty voices of up to three hundred words for a session fee.

Question: If under the current formula I would receive $3208 dollars for doing twenty voices and under the proposed contract, I would get only $802 dollars for doing twenty voices; if this contract passes what do I do.

Answer: Stock up on plenty of KY-Gel.

A.L. Miller SW Editor & Chief

They lie by Omission: It’s AFTRA’s leaderships mode of communication. AFTRA Interactive referendum–and you thought it was going to be a secret ballot.

Related Posts

2009, AFTRA, Anne Marie Johnson, SAG Politics

Mike Pointer The Watchdog’s Worst SAG Member of the Month!

2009, Bing Como, SAG Politics

A Watchdog Classic: Bing Como sings “A SAG Christmas”

2009, AFTRA

The Watchdog has learned that the new Wells Fargo TV Commercial Campaign will go to AFTRA.

Recent Posts

  • Trump Resigns From SAG-AFTRA
  • Trump Resigns from the Union
  • Budweiser Will Not Be Running a Commercial During the Super Bowl for the First Time in 37 Years
  • SAG-AFTRA National Board Orders Disciplinary Hearing for Donald Trump
  • LA Local SAG-AFTRA Members Release Grassroots Union Literacy Guide
  • Dave McNary, Beloved Longtime Variety Film Reporter, Dies at 69
  • Dave McNary Dies: Long-Time Variety Film Reporter Was 69
  • SAG-AFTRA Health Plan Class Action Lawsuit
  • Class-Action Lawsuit Says SAG-AFTRA Health Plan Cuts “Illegally Discriminate Based On Age”
  • SAG-AFTRA Health Plan Sued Over Benefit Cuts for Seniors
  • FilmLA Quickly Rescinded New Limits On After-Hours Filming In LA
  • Hollywood Grapples With Mass Layoffs

Archives

Most Viewed Posts

  • Abra-Cadabra Now you see it! Now you don’t! Be the first on your block to take the SAG Watchdog Quiz to find out what disappeared from the SAG WebsiteAnd Why! (9350)
  • Ned Vaughn Resigns as SAG-AFTRA Exec VP to Run for Assembly! (5845)
  • Fi-Core Jon, George, Wilfred and More!!! (3661)
  • (MORE) Ineptness against Foot dragging: And the winner will be? (1582)
  • Pamela Greenwalt’s Warning to SAG-AFTRA Members (1541)
  • Links (1430)
  • (Article ADDED!!!) SAG-AFTRA Board Approves New Movie-TV Contract, Triggering Ratification Vote! (1365)
  • Ed Asner & Martin Sheen Advise a NO Vote (1257)
  • ‘Midnight Rider’ Accident: More Than 500 Gather for Candlelight Walk and Memorial For Sarah Jones! (1227)
  • WGA Members Ratify New 3-Year Deal! (1083)

Tags

2003200420052006200720082009201020112016Gabrielle CarterisHeadline PhotoIATSEJonathan HandelKen HowardLALos AngelesMembership FirstmergerMidnight RiderNational BoardNBCNed VaughnNew YorkNLRBNOOl DogPaul EdneyPTRestore RespectRoberta ReardonRSVPSAGScott WilsonScreen Actors GuildSVODTHRTVUFSUPDATEVPWatchdogWGAWGAWWriters Guild
Back To Top
SAG Watchdog
Web Design and Maintenance by ImagOvation